Today, the morning after the Associated Press and other
media outlets declared Hillary Clinton the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Glenn Greenwald gave the perfect headline:
Perfect End to Democratic Primary: Anonymous Superdelegates Declare Winner Through Media
On the one hand, I understand why Bernie supporters are
pissed-off about the media making this announcement on the eve of the
California primary (taking place as I write). Bernie defeating Hillary in California
would demonstrate her political weakness (always a good thing). Today’s
announcement will likely depress the vote and make that less likely, and it
would be naïve not to suspect that this announcement was made because someone
wanted just that.
On the other hand, what we’re seeing here is only the
reality of the Democratic Party made blatant. Pace Bernie and his supporters, the problem here is not that the
media is reporting about superdelegates and how they say they’re going to vote.
The problem is the superdelegate system itself, and what it exemplifies about
the Democratic Party. Sandernistas love to show the math and the dates, and
insist that, really, the 750 superdelegates have not yet voted. But the reality
here—the political math—is that
Bernie is not going to persuade hundreds of superdelegates to switch to him.
The political reality is that those superdelegates were put in place to prevent
someone like him from ever getting the nomination. And they are going to do
their job. For which they are well paid in various ways. Bernie and his supporters are running into the Democratic Party wall, and they don’t want to hear it.
It’s not the media, but the Sanders campaign, that is perpetuating a diversionary myth—in this case, about who and what the superdelegates are. They are, in the main, not political actors amenable to reason or ethics in figuring out who is the best candidate, but agents of the money and power interests that control the Party, appointed to vote as those interests wish. Which is worse: To report the political truth or perpetuate a political myth?
A big part of the problem is that Bernie and his supporters
have been wanting to believe that they’re participating in a democratic process
within the un-Democratic Party, which spotted Hillary 400+ points at the
outset. Those superdelegates are only a symptom of the party’s control by
undemocratic forces. That’s the game and arena in which Bernie chose to play.
Bernie entered that race, against the Clinton machine, with a neophyte
organization and little name recognition—deficits that would have taken years
to overcome.
Then again, Bernie entered the race unprepared to win
because he entered the race not intending to win. He may have changed his
attitude as the race developed, but by that time he had ceded the southern
states to Hillary by big margins on Super Tuesday, giving her a cushy lead in
pledged delegates. In the end, Hillary has won pledged and superdelegates. It
works better if you decide you want to win before you enter the race.
Like every other politician, Bernie also entered the race,
having said or done nothing about the increasingly suspicious voting process in
this country. Faced with a lot of fishy voting results (analyzed here
and on Counterpunch here),
the Sanders campaign and its supporters did eventually take notice and raise
some protests. But, again, the time to start talking about restrictive voting
laws and untrustworthy vote-counting practices is before you get into the race,
not when you’re in the middle of it. Unfortunately, nobody does, and I bet
nobody will. Everybody on the left wants democracy in the abstract, but their
minds are too occupied with big-picture issues to bother with the theoretically
uninteresting practical details of who or what
actually counts the votes, and how. Until it’s too late. Then they find
themselves out of the picture, realizing they’ve been playing a game in which
they can never know how cheated they
were.
Bernie has lost by Party-appointed superdelegates and by elected
(through whatever opaque process) pledged delegates. Barring an indictment or
some other deus ex machina, Hillary
is going to be the nominee, and Bernie knows it. Better to confront and analyze the reasons
for that, and figure out what to do next, rather than attack those who report
it, and pretend that something else is going to happen.
So what is Bernie and his posse going to do now, about the Party they’re complaining about? Sure, he should fight through the convention, but not just to insist that the roll be called on July 25th to make it official. Fight for progressive planks in the platform? Well, if that means mounting floor protests, coordinated with protests in the street, demanding public promises from the nominee and the full convention on a number of key issues, with the threat of walking out with his supporters, that would be some kind of bang, at least. Just getting a couple of nice planks in the platform—which, of course, President H will consult before she makes any significant decision? Not so much. “Hey, we got three great planks in the platform. Come back in four years, and maybe we’ll get five!” is not a revolutionary program.
That threat—Affirm the
party’s substantive progressive stance on x, y, and z, publicly and
irrevocably, or we walk out!—is the
only power Bernie and his supporters have in the Democratic convention. He’s
going to have to use it to get any serious change, since Hillary controls all
the committees, Cornel West notwithstanding. And even then, does anyone think that Hillary, as President,
will worry a second about anything she promised at the convention? Then will you leave?
If Bernie and his supporters really do the math, it adds up
to: They’ve already been counted out. Don’t blame the AP for telling you so.
The question is: On what date, if ever, will you walk the
walk? For Bernie himself, that answer has always been, and—I see no reason to
doubt—still is: never. His supporters are going to have to decide, one by one,
on their own. A whimper.
Bernie has taken us on a hell of a ride. Now, as the poet
said: “the end of all our exploring / Will be to arrive where we started / And
know the place for the first time.”
Remember that, in his first victory speech in New Hampshire,
Bernie went out of his way to stress this point:
But, I also hope that we all remember -- and this is a message not just to our opponents, but to those who support me as well. That we will need to come together in a few months and unite this party, and this nation because the right-wing Republicans we oppose must not be allowed to gain the presidency.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be lightly moderated, with disfavor for personal attacks and stunning irrelevancies, and deference to the trenchant and amusing.