First and Foremost, Colonialism Must End
Jim Kavanagh
It Is What It Is
It’s necessary to start with this, because it’s the core of
the problem and must be put first and foremost: The horrific events over the
last week in Gaza and Israel demonstrate at least one thing irrefutably:
Zionism is colonialism. Israel is a colonial-settler, apartheid state that, as
such, must exterminate, expel, or subjugate Palestinian Arabs.
You may think it’s colonialism that’s justified for some
reason, but it’s still colonialism. If you want to support it, you have to make
the argument that it’s an acceptable exception to the now-universal prohibition
of colonialism and apartheid under jus cogens—the
preemptory, compelling norms of international law “from which no derogation is
ever permitted.” And you will be making an argument for colonialism.
You may think—as secular Western liberals are wont to
do—that this exceptional colonialism is justified by the Holocaust,
which you take as proof that Jews are the ur-victims of the planet and
therefore are entitled to take and keep a global safe room for themselves,
even if it means exterminating, expelling, and subjugating the people who have
been living in that room for centuries. That’s an argument that the Palestinians
(who had nothing to do with the European Holocaust) are just less important people,
whose historical obligation is to get out of the way of the Jews (who, whether
victims of the Holocaust or not, are always-already victims). It’s an argument
for colonialism.
Leaving out, as much as they can, the part about the
Palestinians, this is the argument secular Western liberals make to themselves
for Zionism as righteous compensatory colonialism.
Please note that it is not the argument on which the
original Zionist thinkers, their political progeny who rule Israel, or the
religious-Zionist settlers who are Zionism’s shock troops base their colonial
project. For them, the Holocaust is not the reason for the Zionist
colonial project, though it does provide an excuse to Western liberals for
supporting colonialism while convincing themselves they’re doing something else.
Those to whom you cannot make that argument with a straight
face are the Palestinian people. They know, and will not let you ignore,
disguise, or forget that that it’s colonialism, and they are the colonized. They
have not and—what is finally so clear and so upsetting to self-deluded Western
liberals who actually thought they could persuade everyone of Zionism’s
righteousness—will never submit to being the colonized, to living,
because they are not Jewish, as secondary “human animals” in ”a
regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.”
The people of Gaza will never submissively accept their
forced displacement and imprisonment in what Israeli scholar Baruch Kimmerling called
“the largest concentration camp ever to exist.” The people of Palestine will
never allow Jewish-supremacist settler colonists to live in the complacent
comfort of the mastery to which they think they have the right—the comfort they
need to complete the Zionist project. The Palestinians will never generously
and passively accept Zionism’s right to take their homes, lives, and dignity,
even if that makes the West feel better about its history with the Jews.
They will resist colonial domination and, as is their right, fight for liberation from colonial domination “by all available means, including armed struggle.” “No justice, no peace” isn’t a political slogan; it’s political science.
It doesn’t matter too much if a Western anti-Zionist like me
says (to paraphrase the title of another essay)
that colonialism does not have the right to defend Itself, or to exist; it’s
the existence of the resistant Palestinian people that really denies the Jewish-supremacist
State of Israel the right, and the ability, to exist. It's not so much a
question of whether such a state has a right to exist, but rather whether it
has the possibility to exist. When you try to do impossible shit, it
blows up in your face. Did you not see it?
The al-Aqsa Flood operation was the latest event in that
armed struggle, organized by one faction (Hamas), but understood and supported
by all Palestinian resistance fighters as a blow against the settler-colonial,
apartheid regime. It demonstrated that, for all Israel’s supposed military and
technological superiority, it has
not been and will never be able to subjugate into submission the 6+
million Palestinian Arabs—much to the chagrin of
Israeli, American, European, and collaborationist Arab political and media
regimes who thought they could go about their business with Palestinians tucked
safely out of sight and mind.
As Israeli
political leaders know and say, a colonial-settler regime must
exterminate, expel, or subjugate the vast majority of the indigenous population.
Since the stable subjugation of the Palestinian Arabs who are the majority of the population in the land Israel controls (according
to the Israeli Army) is revealed
to be the political impossibility that anyone with a scintilla of historical
consciousness could predict, Israel must now return to the policies of
large-scale extermination and expulsion upon which it jump-started its
unfinished “existence.”
"Right
now, one goal: Nakba! A Nakba that will overshadow the Nakba of 1948,” says a Knesset member Ariel Kallner from the
ruling Likud Party; "We
need to arrange a holocaust for Arabs, exterminate them, murder their children
who will grow up and become terrorists, neuter their women, sterilize their
men, bomb their homes, send them to incinerators, shoot them in the head, and
dump their bodies in the street,” cries an Israeli Facebook poster.
What does our
historical consciousness predict about that?
https://x.com/liseng18/status/1711033059359813868?s=20
The Israelis are
not engaged in a military operation against Hamas; they are engaged in a genocidal
campaign against the whole Palestinian people. I do not throw around terms like
“genocidal” easily, but this is not an exaggeration. It is being done in plain
sight. The evidence is everywhere, although “democratic” Western polities are
doing their clumsy best to censor channels of information and criminalize or
otherwise punish anyone who dares to say what’s happening and protest against
it.
Israeli generals
announce that they consider the 2+ million people of Gaza, half of whom are children,
as “human animals.” They have "released all restraints,” and will turn Gaza into “a place where no human being can exist,” deliberately “creating
a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza,” because that is “a necessary means to
achieve the goal.” And that is correct, because the goal is not to defeat the ~30,000
fighters of Hamas, an organization that was “Israel’s
creation” and that Netanyahu, as late as 2019, specifically urged
funding, in order to help prevent a Palestinian state; the goal is the
extermination of thousands and the expulsion/ethnic cleansing of millions of “human
animals”—first driving a million or so from Northern to Southern Gaza, then
driving as many as possible into Egypt.
As I write, Israel has already, in one week, killed over
2700 people, including over 700 children, dropping a
thousand bombs a day in densely-populated residential areas, targeting
hospitals, journalists, ambulances, and civilians fleeing on roads Israel had
directed them to. That’s the equivalent of 330,000 people in the United States
and a year of U.S. bombing in Afghanistan. Israel has also killed 54 and
wounded 1100 people in the West Bank, where Hamas doesn’t operate. By any
reckoning, this is a genocidal campaign to eliminate a large portion of the
Palestine people, intimidate the remainder and their supporters, and restore
Israeli rule over what Zionism considers its god-given territory.
American and Western supporters of Israel underestimate the
fanaticism of Israeli Zionists. Netanyahu is enacting the mass expulsion to
finish the Nakba that he has championed since at least 1989, when he said:
‘Israel should have taken advantage of [the world’s attention on Tiananmen Square]
… to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the Territories. However, to
my regret, they did not support that policy that I proposed, and which I still
propose should be implemented.” The fascist
religious nationalists now in power in Israel are enacting the “conquest” of
Gaza, an “obligation” that, as Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel, the head of the state-supported
Bnei David academy. which
“funnel[s] of thousands of religious officers into senior combat positions in
the IDF,” carefully explained, has
nothing to do with Hamas: “Even if not one bullet is fired at us. Even if the
residents of Gaza who are not sons of Israel (Jewish) would be constantly
offering us flowers… we would be obliged … to start a war to conquer Eretz
Israel. …it needs to be conquered. This is our land. Our holy land. God has
promised us this land.”
As the Rabbi says, Palestinians are to be conquered because
they are not Jews. The Nazis drove people into a ghetto because they were Jews;
the Zionists drive people into a ghetto because they are not Jews. You can
think that's alright, that the letter is justified by the former. But from my,
and Elise’s, and Norman’s, and most of the world’s point of view, you then have
a narrow, perverse, totally fucked-up, understanding of “never again.”
https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1713293124112380106?s=20
Taking the Stand
In this context, Finkelstein poses another question—"Do concentration camp guards have the right to
self-defense?"—which implicitly deconstructs
all the phony, self-righteous interrogation we
see across Western media of every Palestinian and every supporter of
Palestine’s anti-colonial fight. Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian ambassador to
the UK, had
five family members killed, including two children, and two young children put
in intensive care when Israeli bombs brought their “entire building” down upon
them in Gaza. When Christiane
Amanpour interviewed him, she began by demanding that he “first and foremost” answer the question: “Do you
condemn what Hamas did inside Israel to Israeli civilians?”
You mean during their break out of the concentration camp?
Or, to put it another way, that anyone with a scintilla of
historical consciousness can understand: Nat Turner and his comrades (and John
Brown, and the slaves in Haiti, and the Mau-Mau in Kenya, and the IRA in
Ireland, and various actors in every slave and anticolonial rebellion in
history) committed what we can call atrocities, beyond anything the al-Aqsa
Flood fighters have been proven to commit during their act of escape from, and
revolt against, “the largest concentration camp ever to exist.” It is right and
proper, and necessary for the sake of intellectual and ethical honesty, to
recognize all that.
What is, in such
a context, not right and proper, what is totally unnecessary, is to convene meetings
with every slave and abolitionist, and demand that they “first and foremost”
answer the question: “Do you condemn what Nat Turner did to the civilians of Southampton
County, Virginia?” What is not right
and proper, and is totally fucked-up, is to also urgently convene all the
grandees of society to proclaim “We Stand with the Slaveholders!” and send those
slaveholders arms and ammunition to enforce their oh-so-understandable project
of increasing their repression of the slaves and attacking anyone who
may come to their aid, because what else can they do to prevent such
atrocities from ever happening again.
What’s not right and proper and is totally unnecessary is to shun,
censor, and/or imprison anyone who speaks or protests by saying something like:
“The first and foremost problem here, the source of all the violence, is not
Nat Turner but the slave system itself.”
The purpose of
these “Do you condemn Nat Turner?” interrogations is not to engage in a
good-faith discussion of the ethics of anti-slavery/colonialism vs.
slaveholding/colonialist violence, but to get people first and foremost to
renounce the anti-slavery/colonial fight—i.e., to defend and reinforce the
framework of the slave/colonial system. As we all understand in the context
of American history, but many pretend they don’t see in the context of
Zionist colonialism.
Historical ethics
and good sense 101: Despite Christiane and her ilk’s insistence, the first
and foremost problem here, the source of all the violence, is not anything
Hamas did, but the colonial-settler, Jewish-supremacist, apartheid system of
Zionism. As Chris Hedges says:
“The terror Israel inflicts is the terror it will get.” In response to Nat
Turner’s rebellion, even some slaveholders understood this—like Thomas
Jefferson’s grandson, who
“tried but failed to convince the General Assembly to enact a plan that would
have put the state on the path to gradual emancipation.”
Today’s Euro-American liberal and conservative Zionists are
worse, and stupider, than that slaveholder, as they enthusiastically and
self-righteously “stand with” Zionist colonialism and cheer on Israel’s
intensified terror against its colonized people.
We must demand that they first and foremost answer this
question: “Do you support Jewish-supremacist colonialism?” and make them shame
themselves with their answer or lack thereof.
https://x.com/CraigMurrayOrg/status/1713335006121140511?s=20
Those who “Stand
with Israel” cannot, or do not want to, see that they are contextualizing and
accepting and supporting every act of armed repression by Israel in exactly the
same way as Craig Murray means when he says:
“In the coming Gaza genocide, every act of armed resistance by Hamas and
Hezbollah will have my support.” What’s apparent in both stances, but
self-righteously obfuscated in the former, is that nobody comes out of the
violence of an unjust system with clean hands, and the first and foremost
thing is not how clean your hands are, but what you’re fighting for. In
this case, it’s whether you’re fighting for the enforcement of, or liberation
from, colonial domination.
As a rather famous Jew said:
“A slave-owner who through cunning and violence shackles a slave in chains, and
a slave who through cunning or violence breaks the chains – let not the
contemptible eunuchs tell us that they are equals before a court of morality!.”
I stand alongside Craig Murray with those who fight against Zionist colonialism and hope that it soon meets the same fate as slavery, and I understand that the people who stand with Israel’s attempt to secure and expand its colonial rule through a genocidal attack on Gaza are only assuring that there will be more terror all around. And the terror inflicted by the slave/colonial system is always orders of magnitude greater than any terror inflicted by revolt against it.
Upcharge
In fact, what Israel and the United States are preparing for
now, in order to defend Zionist colonialism, is a storm of terror that
threatens to engulf the entire world.
Israel has been so contemptuous of Palestinian agency,
intelligence, and self-respect as to think that, if it could just eliminate, or
at least regime-change, the countries that supported the Palestinian
resistance, the Palestinian people would have to accept defeat. Thus, on behalf
of the Zionist project (Yes, that was the reason for all those
“senseless” wars), the United States embarked on a series of wars to do just
that—take out countries (Iraq, Libya, Syria) that had provided military, financial,
and diplomatic support for the Palestinian resistance. And they had
considerable success with that, doing real damage to the Palestinian cause,
until the train was interrupted in Syria.
But interrupted it was. Syria is hobbled but standing. Meanwhile,
Iran, the country that was supposed to be the next stop for the train, remains
a determined state supporter of Palestinian resistance and has only grown
militarily and politically stronger. Iran and the anti-Zionist Lebanese force
allied with it, Hezbollah, are capable of doing serious damage to Israel in
defense of the Palestinians if they deem it necessary. Indeed, Hezbollah is a
much stronger military force than Hamas, with thousands of fighters who have
gained valuable military experience fighting against U.S-. and Israeli-sponsored
jihadists in Syria and against Israel itself in Southern Lebanon, and with
thousands of advanced missiles that can accurately strike everywhere in Israel.
So, the question
in everyone’s mind, as we watch Israel destroy and depopulate Gaza from air and
artillery strikes, and wait for an invasion by the 300,000-man army Israel has
assembled, is: Will Hezbollah and Iran—and indeed other Arab and Islamic
countries—sit and watch passively as this Nakba 2.0 unfolds? Or will there be a
military intervention to stop the slaughter and ethnic cleansing the whole
world is watching?
This is why the
U.S. is sending two carrier battle groups to the Eastern Mediterranean, A-10
ground-attack planes to the UAE, the 101st Airborne to Jordan, and more. That’s serious power, and it’s not for any fight
against Hamas in Gaza. It’s for the threat of Hezbollah intervention from
Southern Lebanon and Syria, which Israel will have trouble handling on its own.
When Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin says, “Our focus is to make sure that we get Israel what
it needs in order to protect itself,” he means: “The United States is bringing
its armed forces to protect the Zionist colonial enterprise, including any
military and ethnic cleansing action it wants to take in Gaza or anywhere else,
from any attempt to intervene by any party, because we know there are forces
that may intervene from which Israel cannot ‘protect itself.’”
More ominously, this force is preparing for the possible attack on Iran that Israel has
been pushing the U.S. to undertake for years. That’s why Israel and its
American Zionist allies have been trying to identify Hamas with Hezbollah as an
agent of Iran, although Hamas (Israeli-nurtured, as we’ve seen) has always
been peripheral, and occasionally antagonistic, to the Iran-Hezbollah alliance.
This identification allows any damage Hamas does to Israel in Gaza, as well as
any intervention by Hezbollah from Lebanon, to be blamed on, and become a casus
belli for war on, Iran. Have no doubt: This is what Israel and its American
allies want.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Michael McCaul is already
“drawing up an authorization for the use of military force (AUMF) against
Hamas, Hezbollah, and other groups in the region if the Gaza war escalates…[that]
would apply to Iran as well.”
I have said previously that there will be a war on Iran before a war on China, and here we are:
This is a war Israel needs soon. They can’t wait to destroy Iran’s growing capacity to defy Israel’s military aggressions and to support Palestinian resistance to the rampage that is coming. The Ukraine situation may put it off a bit, or may bring it on sooner, but the push for this war will ripen before China
As for Ukraine—well, Zelensky is finding out what it means to be a side piece. The United States has one true love it is absolutely loyal to.
For their part, Hezbollah and Iran, though they have not
been seeking direct conflict with Israel, must be considering A) What it would
mean for their credibility, for their claim to defend Palestine, to sit and
watch Nakba 2.0? Will they be intimidated by U.S. politicians’ threat to attack
Iran if it “escalates” by helping Gaza in any way, while Israel is allowed
constantly to escalate by bombing Syria and Lebanon at will? and B) Will there ever be a better reason or a
better time to confront Israel directly? The whole of the Arab and Islamic
world would support them (two million Iranians as well as fighters from Afghanistan
and elsewhere have volunteered to fight for Palestine, Iraqi resistance groups
have vowed to “target US bases if
Washington intervenes,” even the Gulf states could not dare to complain). It’s
also the case that Israel certainly and the U.S. to an unusual extent, given the
depletion of its military stocks for Ukraine, would be stretched thin
militarily. Aircraft carriers are scary; so are hypersonic anti-ship missiles.
If you got ‘em…
The situation is extremely dangerous. Any serious action
from Hezbollah would probably result in direct American military involvement,
and very likely lead to an attack on Iran by the U.S. and Israel. In any such
attack, Israel will use nuclear weapons, notwithstanding any promise
they make to the U.S. not to. Israel would not enter such a conflict without
doing everything it can to set Iran back for at least ten years, and nuclear weapons
are the only instrument it can think might do that. As a result of any such
conflict, Iran will be devastated but remain, and Israel will be devastated,
with many settlers rushing to the East Bank. Of the Hudson. No justice and no
peace.
I have also said
that I think there’s a 50-50 chance for a nuclear war over Ukraine, but that’s
diminishing. The chance of nuclear war over Iran is exactly equal to the chance
of an attack on Iran by the U.S. and Israel, and that is increasing.
Please note again: This is all about saving the Zionist, Jewish-supremacist
colonial project from the Palestinian people, who must be exterminated,
expelled, or subjugated without resistance from their own or allied forces. Everybody
outside the Euro-American Zionist media bubble knows this and understands how
fucked up it is.
The other people to whom you cannot make your argument for
justifiable colonialism are the countries of the global South—i.e., most of
the, you know, post-colonial world—who immediately recognize, and have
no tolerance for, the forked-tongue bullshit of righteous colonialism. Which is
why most of the world sides with the Palestinians and is becoming more
infuriated every day with the supremacist cruelty and sanctimonious hypocrisy
of Israel and its Western supporters. Everybody knows what it would be called
and what would be done if we were seeing European Whites or Jews in a Gaza
Ghetto being exterminated and expelled by Arabs and Muslims. The more adamant
they are in their schemes, the more Israel and the U.S. will be despised by most
of humanity.
This conflict we are in may well destroy the Zionist regime
in Israe,l and/or the Palestinian national cause, and/or the Iranian state,
and/or all of us; it will definitely destroy the last vestige of American credibility
and hegemony in the world. Like Christianity in the Roman Empire, Zionism insinuated
itself as a parasite within the American imperial project and is destroying its
host. Unlike Christianity, it’s going to have a hard time surviving without that
host.
But it’s also got a Samson Option— “We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under”—as described by Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld twenty years ago, in a discussion of the crisis Israel was then facing from intifada, as recounted by journalist David Hirst:
Iran can never be threatened in its very existence. Israel can. Indeed, such a threat could even grow out of the current intifada. That, at least, is the pessimistic opinion of Martin van Creveld, professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. “'If it went on much longer,” he said, “the Israeli government [would] lose control of the people. In campaigns like this, the anti-terror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing. I regard a total Israeli defeat as unavoidable. That will mean the collapse of the Israeli state and society. We'll destroy ourselves.”
In this situation, he went on, more and more Israelis were coming to regard the “transfer” of the Palestinians as the only salvation; resort to it was growing “more probable” with each passing day. Sharon “wants to escalate the conflict and knows that nothing else will succeed.”
But would the world permit such ethnic cleansing? “That depends on who does it and how quickly it happens. We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’ I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
Plus ça change... Uncanny, how the same dynamic repeats itself—how the world’s great leaders and media pundits think they’ve gotten past the problem and forget it completely, and how the repressed always returns, with all the great minds perplexed about “How did this terrible thing happen? What can we do about it?” The “problem” being the impossibility of settler-colonialism in the modern world, and “the repressed” being the Palestinian people. Uncanny, and infuriating, that we have to keep repeating ourselves on this historical hamster wheel while the exit is simple and obvious: Colonialism does not work. It destroys the colonized and the colonizer, and the whole world that gets involved in it. End it.
Baton Pass
As the U.S. and Israel maneuver themselves and the world
into an existential crisis, as the U.S. demonstrates conclusively that it is a
thoroughly Zionist country that will never use the power it has to force
Israel to get off the wheel (and will in fact use all the power it has
to keep Israel running on it), the new actual adults in the room are stepping
up. Whatever you think of them, Russia and China do not have the libidinal
investment the U.S. has in Israel, and are now speaking up—rather naively, I think—for
the position that the United Nations has approved and self-appointed Western
peacemakers ostensibly support, the two-state solution (which Israel will never
accept).
Putin has stated quite accurately that American-led
diplomacy was always on behalf of Israel, that it was tinged with the legacy of
colonialism, and that the US should not and cannot pose as the diplomatic
arbiter of this conflict. The world is listening and knows it’s true: The U.S.’s
time as the world’s leader and diplomatic maestro is over.
There are other countries that have the power and
credibility to take a central role, and who still know how to do actual
diplomacy. Russia and/or China will put forward cease-fire resolutions in the
UN. Hamas has already favorably greeted a Russian proposal. There’s talk of
Russia escorting Turkish humanitarian aid through Israel’s sea blockade of
Gaza. As the Gaza massacre extends, most of the BRICS countries, and even some
European, will come to support all this.
The United States will browbeat and bribe every country on
the Security Council on behalf of Israel and veto anything that Israel doesn’t
want, revealing itself to be a lonely, atavistic, stupidly aggressive dinosaur,
unable to act in the world’s best, or its own intelligent, interest. Whatever
comes of this will accelerate the demise of U.S. power. In favor of Russia and
China. Standing with Israel’s colonial aggression in Gaza will result in at
least as great a defeat for the U.S. as the one it’s suffering in Ukraine.
Unfortunately, I doubt anything will stop the ongoing and planned
Israeli aggression. Some faction in the U.S. foreign policy apparatus may (must!)
be smart enough to see how dangerous a ground invasion of Gaza would be. There
seems to be a pause, and now that Biden has announced a visit to Israel, it’s doubtful
Israel will invade until that show is over. But the Israeli leadership is
fanatical and on tilt. They know that anything less than the demolition, bunker-busting
(per Seymour
Hersh), and complete, permanent control of Gaza, which will require a
military presence, will be perceived, correctly, as a defeat. And they know the
U.S. will go along with anything they do. I do not see how to prevent the
catastrophe of Palestinian massacre and ethnic cleansing and/or the horrible
conflagration of a regional or global war.
First and last: Colonialism is unjust and impossible. Stand
with Palestine.
_______________________________
A version of this article, without the Trotsky quote, appeared on Counterpunch.
Related articles: Apartheid Does Not Have the Right To Defend Itself, Or To Exist, Sacrificing Gaza: The Great March of Zionist Hypocrisy, Gaza Calling: It’s the Colonialism, Stupid!
If you like this article, you can Buy Me A Coffee (or a Bourbon) or make a
one-time donation via PayPal, Venmo, Cash App., or Zelle (preferred). You
can also support my work by taking a paid subscription to my Substack, where I publish everything,
including media appearances. Thanks for your support!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be lightly moderated, with disfavor for personal attacks and stunning irrelevancies, and deference to the trenchant and amusing.