American college students have launched a movement that has run into the Iron Wall of Zionism
SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGEs |
It was the subject of a foundational book
by a founding father of modern Zionism. It was the object that Zionist soldiers
ruthlessly defended in 2018. It is what protesting American students have just
run into. Concretely and conceptually, it is the keystone of the Zionist
project: the Wall.
The first rule of Zionism is that the wall must be
absolutely impenetrable.
The material wall must be impenetrable because, in the
context of an ethno-religious supremacism, it's the boundary that separates the
elect, the chosen, the ubermenschen from the rejected, the dispossessed,
the untermenschen. Any breach in the wall will lead, inexorably and
quickly, to a breakdown of the essentialist exceptionalism and the social order
premised thereupon.
In the white-supremacist segregated south, the police
and the dogs and the nightsticks had to be used to prevent even one black
child from entering a white school because, they knew, that would mean the end
of Jim Crow.
In Jewish-supremacist apartheid Israel, as Israeli academic and political advisor Arnon Soffer said years before the Great March of Return in 2018, it is necessary for Israel to “put a bullet in the head of anyone who tries to climb over the security fence.” Israel must prevent even one Gazan from crossing the wall, because “when 2.5 million people live in a closed-off Gaza, it’s going to be a human catastrophe. … The pressure at the border will be awful. … So, … we will have to kill and kill and kill. All day, every day…. If we don’t kill, we will cease to exist.”
Now that the Palestinian resistance from Gaza has
crossed the “security fence” wall, Israel must use bombs and rockets and
starvation to kill and kill and kill masses of Palestinians all day, every day—“totally
annihilate” them. If that wall can't hold, the Palestinians have to go—to
their deaths or to a place beyond a farther, stronger wall. Because, the Jewish
supremacists know, leaving the Palestinians defiantly present would mean the
end of Zionism. As Ali Abunimah said,
in the context of a previous Israeli attack: “The Gaza massacre is the price of
a ‘Jewish state’.”
The other first rule of Zionism—for Western secular
liberals, at least—is that the wall must be invisible.
The conceptual wall must be invisible because, in the
context of a world that has foresworn and forbidden racism and colonialism, to
see such a wall is to call for its destruction.
Above all, Western secular liberals must not see the
wall they have constructed in their minds between the uber- and untermenschen.
“Of course, I'm anti-racist and anti-colonialist. I abhor apartheid and Jim
Crow. I stand with Martin and Malcolm and my heart, too, is buried at Wounded Knee!
I do, however, assume that it was not only an acceptable, but a wonderful thing,
that 80% of the Palestinian Arab population was killed or expelled in order to
establish a Jewish-supremacist state. I accept that we must unconditionally
support that state as it subjugates and continues incrementally, with only
occasional massacres, to kill, imprison, ghettoize, demolish and take the homes
of the less important Arab people in favor of the more important Jewish
settlers. And I assume, as Nathan J. Robinson succinctly summarized
Zionist ethics, that: ‘Any amount of Palestinian death, however large, [is]
justified to prevent any amount of risk to Israelis, however small. I assume
these things, but I don’t think about them. What Zionism? Black Lives
Matter!’”
They must not see the Zionism they embrace. In fact,
they avoid even seeing the word. Very few will ever, like Joe Biden, say “I am
a Zionist.” There’s a “progressive” website that routinely flags “Zionist” in
submissions as a word to be avoided because it makes people uncomfortable. I
wonder why that is?
Western, and especially American, secular liberals
also must not see the corresponding ideological and political barriers
constructed by the regime they live in, even as they continually and carefully
step their way around them. “Let’s talk about foreign election interference.
Russia, China, Iran! Let’s talk about how we constantly get into ‘senseless’
wars against Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran! What elephant?” The Discreet Charm
of the Western liberal Zionist.
This latter, conceptual wall, the “mind-forg’d
manacle” is the most important. American support, upon which Zionism depends,
depends on that wall. If it is uncloaked and seen, if one unpleasant intruder
gets in—i.e., “settler colonialism,” “Jewish supremacism”—the entire edifice of
Zionism will be fatally undermined. No miscegenation, in thought or deed.
Both walls are maintained and defended, and can only
be breached, by force. The wall of Jim Crow segregation was defended with the
force of armed racists, the law, and the police. It took years of determined nonviolent
and armed political resistance, and finally the use of political and military
force by the national power to remove that wall and end that segregation.
The material wall protecting Zionism is defended by
political, economic, and military force—by bullets, guns, bombs, and political,
economic, and diplomatic intimidation provided for Israel by the United States
and its Western clients. The conceptual wall is defended by a massive
ideological apparatus of controlled and self-controlled media, schools, and
laws and policies managing the availability of knowledge and the permissible
expression of ideas. It will take a determined resistance on all fronts to tear
down those walls.
The uprising of students on American campuses has
opened a powerful new front that threatens, and has run into, that wall.
It's been made possible by the internet opening universally
accessible new sources of current and historical information, and new platforms
for the debate and expression of ideas. It's been accelerated from zero to hypersonic
in six months by Israel’s blatant genocidal violence in Gaza, playing out on
phone screens throughout the day in real time.
The younger generation, who have had access to current
and historical information and in whom the epistemological patterns of self-deception
have not been sufficiently formed, clearly see, name, and refuse to let anyone
ignore the wall they are determined to break through: “This is genocide.
This is ethnic cleansing. This is the deliberate demolition of a whole society
and the mass murder of women and children. This is what we all know to be an
apex crime against humanity. This—Israel has been and is telling us and we will
not ignore—is Zionism.”
That—making Zionism visible and putting the question
of its legitimacy on the table—is why the powers-that-be in the United States
hate and fear the current student movement, and will use all of their power to
crush it. Criticizing specific excessive Israeli policies, arguing about
proportionality, expressing sympathy for Palestinians as victims are permitted;
identifying and rejecting Zionism as a form of Jewish-supremacist settler
colonialism, and supporting Palestinian resistance thereto, is anathema.
To my surprise and delight, what we’ve been witnessing
over the past few weeks, sparked by the students at Columbia University, looks
like the birth of an American anti-Zionist movement. After writing about
the cruelty and criminality of Zionism for decades, after being disappointed
that Israel’s gratuitous killings and maimings during the what I called the Great
March of Zionist Hypocrisy in 2018 did not spark a wave of revulsion to
Zionism, it has been wonderful to see so many people—especially young people,
and especially young Jews—posting videos saying something like: “I didn’t know
much about Palestine-Israel until October 7th, then I looked into it
and now I realize how fucked-up Zionism is!” with young Jews adding: “I was
brought up to think of Zionism as an integral part of my Jewishness. No more. I
now find it in contradiction to my Jewish values.”
This is powerful stuff and, kid ourselves not, it
cannot be permitted. That is why we are seeing furious repression against
demonstrations on campuses that have been using their history of student
activism as a selling point:
Columbia is a far different place today than it was in the spring of 1968 when protesters took over University buildings amid discontent about the Vietnam War, racism and the University’s proposed expansion into Morningside Park. After a weeklong standoff, New York City Police stormed the campus and arrested more than 700 people. The fallout dogged Columbia for years. https://news.columbia.edu/content/new-perspective-1968
In 1985, protesters padlocked and chained Hamilton Hall as they demanded that the university divest from companies that were doing business in South Africa. The university was reluctant to comply…Three weeks later, the students ended their blockade…Later that year, Columbia’s board of trustees voted to sell all of the university’s stock in American companies doing business in South Africa. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/nyregion/hamilton-hall-columbia-student-protests.html
When the issue is something as important as war and apartheid, everybody knows the important thing is not whether you’re trespassing; it’s which side you are on, what you’re fighting for. Everybody now knows the anti-Vietnam war and anti-apartheid protestors were on the right side, about something important. In 1985, the university administration knew, and knew that the world knew, that the students protesting white supremacist apartheid over black South Africans were on the right side, and therefore had to let them occupy Hamilton Hall for three weeks.
Students are asking a very simple question: If it was morally correct to oppose racist colonial apartheid South Africa, why isn't it morally correct to oppose racist colonial apartheid in Israel that is involved in an active genocide?
— Ajamu Baraka (@ajamubaraka) May 3, 2024
Today, the university administration immediately sics
a thousand cops on the students occupying Hamilton Hall to protest Jewish-supremacist
genocide, because 1) they know, and know the world knows, the students are on
the right side of history, 2) the University administration, subservient to the
US ruling class and its political representatives, is on the wrong, atavistic
and rejected, side of history and supports the Jewish-supremacist colonial prerogative
over Palestinian Arabs, and 3) therefore, must try to stamp that whole issue
out of the public sphere as quickly and thoroughly as possible, and intimidate
anyone who might want to raise it again.
For the same reasons, today, to an extent
unprecedented in those prior protest cycles, the entire bipartisan political and
media elite must unite to crush, criminalize, and forbid anti-Zionist
dissent. They are proceeding to do that with laws (like the Antisemitism
Awareness Act) that, formally, and media coverage that, implicitly and ridiculously,
define anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism, thereby rendering invisible the
many—disproportionate number, I think—of Jews at the forefront of the movement.
Everybody knows there are orders of magnitude more Christian than Jewish
Zionists, some of the most committed anti-Zionists are Jews, and there is 𝘯𝘰 necessary or intrinsic connection between Judaism and
Zionism. But certain things that are obvious must not be seen.
It's hard to make people unlearn and unsee, but that
is what they must and will try to do, with the harshest repression. As someone
who participated in campus protests and building occupations in the past, I am
certain the breadth and severity of the American state’s reaction to these
anti-Zionist protests will be unprecedented. The students will be expelled and
arrested. Laws will be passed criminalizing criticism of Israel and Zionism.
Censorship of social media will be tightened. No American anti-Zionist
political movement can be allowed.
Because it’s not just that Zionism has been part of
Jewish identity; through decades of relentless, well-organized and well-funded
ideological and political work, it has installed itself as part of American
identity.
We live in a country where powerful politicians and
the wealthy donors who control them proclaim their fealty to Israel; where
Israeli officials enjoy veto power over candidates for office down to the
level of State Assembly; where a Secretary of State gives a “devoutly
Zionist” speech and is still criticized for not being obsequious enough to
Israel; where Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces galas are hosted by
Republican (Sheldon & Miriam Adelson) and Democratic (Haim Saban)
billionaires to collect $50
million a night tax-deductible to its donors; where a lecturer at the National
Defense University and the US Army War College can, without objection, say:
“The United States military, then, is a Zionist institution”; where the
President declares,
“I am a Zionist” and a President who was excoriated for avoiding service in the
American army can say,
“I would personally grab a rifle, get in a ditch, and fight and die” for
Israel, and nobody bats an eyelash; and where the Speaker of the House says, “If this Capitol
crumbled to the ground, the one thing that would remain is our commitment to,
our aid—and I don't even call it aid, our cooperation—with Israel. That's
fundamental.”
The United States has become a Zionist country, and those who made it so are going to do anything to prevent that from changing. One of the things they have to do is prevent you from seeing or thinking about that. That’s why Hillary Clinton’s campaign decided not to highlight—except to donors—her love for Israel: “We shouldn't have Israel at public events. Especially dem (Democratic) activists...she can drop in Israel when she's with donors.”
Due to your blatant antisemitism (and that's all of you), I hereby decree that from now on, in all communications written and verbal, Israel must only be referred to as The country of which we do not speak
— Alon Mizrahi I without equality there's no freedom (@alon_mizrahi) May 2, 2024
So, the nascent American anti-Zionist movement
represented by the campus protests must be crushed, and the impenetrability and
invisibility of the wall of Zionism restored. Hard to do, when the Israelis are
massacring and starving to death tens of thousands of Gazans on live stream.
But understand, as the Israelis do, that the future of Zionism is at stake in
how that battle unfolds in the next few months, and realize, precisely by
seeing what they are doing to Gaza, that Zionists in Israel and here will
do anything to assure the continuation of the Zionist project.
I don't know what will become of the student movement
once school is out. I know that the young people powering it will not unlearn
or unsee what they now know, and I expect they will bring the disruption home.
It belongs everywhere. I know that they've earned the respect of the world, and—what
should make them most proud—the gratitude of Palestinians for forcing the
United States and the Western world not to ignore them. I know the
students have smartly and courageously, at significant risk to themselves, jump-started
a new American anti-Zionist movement—and there is no movement more
important. And I know that, in doing so, they have run into what really is an
iron wall.
If that movement is to have a significant positive effect,
in time, on the fate of the Gazan people, there will have to be a lot—millions—more
Americans, including workers in every sphere, who will stand and fight with those
courageous students and demand that their government break with the enemy of
humanity that Zionism is. The iron is very hot. Now is the time to strike.
_______________
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be lightly moderated, with disfavor for personal attacks and stunning irrelevancies, and deference to the trenchant and amusing.